mplayer without libmp3lame support

[Ed Greshko]

Res wrote:

> Thats your choice to call it that, but for you to call it that without
> proof or knowing why that netblock is taken out, you yourself are no
> better then what you accuse it of being.

Then tell me why 203.70.27.120/29 is blocked.  Also, why is
211.23.32.122~211.23.32.126 blocked.  I have other since I contract for more
companies in Taiwan and all of them are blocked from this site.