SELinux Understanding

[Arthur Pemberton]

On 10/13/07, Karl Larsen <k5di at zianet.com> wrote:
> Thomas Cameron wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 05:38 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> That's called coincidence, not proof.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>     I think your trying to protect SELinux. I don't know why.
> >>
> >
> > No, it's pointing out the obvious.  The issue you had was NOT - repeat
> > NOT - an issue with SELinux.
> >
> > A lot of people a lot smarter than you have said so, you bring NO proof
> > to the list, just supposition based on coincidence.
> >
> > I've tried to be polite to you out of respect to my elders, but you are
> > just full of shit and won't listen to folks who know a bunch more than
> > you do.
> >
> > Get this through your head:  Your issues are NOT due to SELinux.  I
> > don't know what you did, but you are the kind of user that sysadmins
> > HATE because you go in and jack up your system and then blame the system
> > or the admin.
> >
> > Listen to those who know more than you do, OK?
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
>     Listen you fat head jerk! You brought nothing but your gut feeling
> that SELinux can't be the cause period.
>
>     Well your almost right. But you have no idea why. You do not know
> why your right. Or what that means. I will not turn SELinux back on
> until a Bug is fixed in F7 8-)


Yup, officially time to add you to my block list. Have a nice life.

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )