SELinux last straw

Arthur Pemberton pemboa at
Thu Oct 18 18:29:02 UTC 2007

On 10/18/07, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> > Nothing warranting the kind of flaming that is going on. I've been
> > using SELinux when appropriate for years now.
> I think the real missing piece here is a good definition of
> 'appropriate' in this context (SELinux as delivered in fedora).  What
> situation warrants the extra trouble of managing it, yet can deal with
> the general unstability and update frequency of the distribution?

1) Desktop/workstations on the open internet
2) Testing for production system to be deployed on RHEL
3) Soon... general usage

Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( )

More information about the users mailing list