mounting /usr read-only -- didn't this *used* to work?
John Summerfield
debian at herakles.homelinux.org
Sun Oct 21 21:25:33 UTC 2007
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> once upon a time, after i set up my fedora system, i had a habit of
> re-mounting the entire /usr filesystem read-only so that, even as
> root, i couldn't do something indescribably stupid and destroy
> valuable files. (theoretically, this remounting should be fine since,
> according to the FHS, the contents of /usr should be static and
> shareable.)
>
> all i would do (and demo to students in class, as well, since they
> thought it was tres cool), was to use mount with the remount option:
>
> # mount -oro,remount /usr
>
> if i try that nowadays, though, i get:
>
> # mount -oro,remount /usr
> mount: /usr is busy
>
make it ro in /etc/fstab
>
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu
Please do not reply off-list
More information about the users
mailing list