How best get rid of SELinux?

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 00:26:23 -0500,
  Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/22/07, Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:40:27 -0700,
> >   Bruce Byfield <bbyfield at axion.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > However, why don't those who prefer not to have SELinux use Revisor to
> > > make their own custom install disk that excludes it?
> >
> > Because it is part of the kernel and some user space code calls it. So you
> > need to change existing packages, not just skipping installing some. This
> > requires doing something at a lower level than Revisor.
> 
> 
> So you would have it removed so that so us want it have to do all that
> you have mentioned? Or we just leave it in, and those who don't want
> to use it disable it?

You misunderstood my response. I was explaining that the suggestion to use
revisor wasn't going to work (without a lot of other work); not that I was
interested in doing that.