How best (BUT WHY) get rid of SELinux?

Craig White craigwhite at azapple.com
Wed Sep 26 04:53:38 UTC 2007


On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:02 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Craig White wrote:
> >On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 08:21 +1000, Res wrote:
> >> knowing when they are done it works, not have to contact the NOC at 5AM
> >> because selinux has fucked them up the ass and they are stressing their
> >> clients cant interact with them,
> >
> >----
> >nice - thanks for the visual metaphor - good thing you won't be confused
> >with someone with an objective point of view.
> >
> Stuff it Craig.  Just because he doesn't have a view that co-incides with 
> yours, doesn't mean he doesn't have a right to say it.
----
stuff it?

The metaphor employed by Res simply is not appropriate for the list. His
point of view is/was/has been a non sequitur...and the reference to
repetitive anal insertion is at best stupid.

Should anyone infer something from your defense of his anal insertion
references?




More information about the users mailing list