How best (BUT WHY) get rid of SELinux?
pemboa at gmail.com
Wed Sep 26 05:00:33 UTC 2007
On 9/25/07, Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:02 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Craig White wrote:
> > >On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 08:21 +1000, Res wrote:
> > >> knowing when they are done it works, not have to contact the NOC at 5AM
> > >> because selinux has fucked them up the ass and they are stressing their
> > >> clients cant interact with them,
> > >
> > >----
> > >nice - thanks for the visual metaphor - good thing you won't be confused
> > >with someone with an objective point of view.
> > >
> > Stuff it Craig. Just because he doesn't have a view that co-incides with
> > yours, doesn't mean he doesn't have a right to say it.
> stuff it?
> The metaphor employed by Res simply is not appropriate for the list. His
> point of view is/was/has been a non sequitur...and the reference to
> repetitive anal insertion is at best stupid.
> Should anyone infer something from your defense of his anal insertion
dude give up. do what i did, block the appropriate individuals at the
email client level and move on.
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )
More information about the users