gorged harddrive
Ed Greshko
Ed.Greshko at greshko.com
Tue Apr 1 02:57:39 UTC 2008
charles f. zeitler wrote:
> --- Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko at greshko.com> wrote:
>
>> charles f. zeitler wrote:
>>> i've been pruning my "downloads" disk,
>>> rather drastically, and not making a dent.
>>>
>>> today some more, less drastic but still
>>> hefty, same result.
>>>
>>> revisited du- checked it twice - three
>>> times- yup, it reports one directory at
>>> 800+ gb- on a 400gb disk!
>>>
>>> fsck (forced) failed to report any problems,
>>> there don't seem to be any symlinks,
>>> and the sub-direcory sizes are sane...
>>>
>>> any ideas welcome, and appreciated.
>> Instead of telling people what you are seeing it would be better to show the
>> actual commands and output.
>>
> good point.
>
>
> [fedora_8 at Nyarlethotep ~]$ df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda8 13250836 11459264 1107608 92% /
> /dev/sda9 1898468 825572 974904 46% /tmp
> /dev/sda11 270882768 259964688 5414052 98% /home
> /dev/sda10 1898468 1156484 643992 65% /var
> /dev/sdc1 480719056 370452080 105383136 78% /home/fedora_8/music_vids
> /dev/sda2 101105 17986 77898 19% /boot
> tmpfs 1037552 248 1037304 1% /dev/shm
> /dev/sdb1 384578164 330445976 34596748 91% /home/fedora_8/torrents_isos
>
> /dev/sdb1 is the drive under discussion.
>
>
> [fedora_8 at Nyarlethotep ~]$ du -sb t*s/*
> 34256010522 torrents_isos/backup
> 883393808812 torrents_isos/data
> 58352749159 torrents_isos/finished
> 75197043648 torrents_isos/finnished
> 18222558607 torrents_isos/isos
> 4781438 torrents_isos/logs
> 16384 torrents_isos/lost+found
> 4096 torrents_isos/lost_meta
> 193903286 torrents_isos/meta
> 1402434610 torrents_isos/new
> 75585799469 torrents_isos/porn
> 4096 torrents_isos/rar
> 1318803 torrents_isos/shas
> 4096 torrents_isos/tmp
> 97996487 torrents_isos/total_meta.tar.bz2
> 4096 torrents_isos/zip
>
> somethings wrong with t*s/data ....
>
OK.... I believe I know what the problem is. The torrents_isos/porn
directory makes things seem larger than what they really are....
No, just kidding.....
I believe you may have a bunch of non-completed torrent downloads. When you
start a torrent download the client will reserve the space and it will be
reflected in the output of "du" but *not* in the output of "df". Thus with
"du" you can have a situation where it "thinks" more disk space is being
used than it actually is. FWIW, this is normal.
More information about the users
mailing list