Biometrics

Tim ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Fri Apr 18 04:12:08 UTC 2008


On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 15:32 -0400, max bianco wrote:
> Last time I looked the fingerprint scanners were easy to trick. I
> chalked it up to a waste of time to even bother with it. They any
> better now? 

The ones where you plonk a finger down and it scans are were very
susceptible to forgeries (someone lifting a print from the scan window
and putting a faked print back down again).  But I haven't heard
anything about outsmarting the ones where you smear your finger down a
thin scanning window (you'd need a faked print that'd survive being
scraped across the scanner).

-- 
(This computer runs FC7, my others run FC4, FC5 & FC6, in case that's
 important to the thread.)

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.




More information about the users mailing list