Fedora Desktop future- RedHat moves

[max bianco]

On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Antonio Olivares
<olivares14031 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>  --- Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Antonio Olivares
>  > <olivares14031 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>  > >  On adobe flash, you bring up an interesting
>  > point, ads
>  > >  are everywhere, if adobe flash is not present,
>  > you
>  > >  cannot do anything.
>  >
>  > You need to start visiting better sites. No good
>  > website relies on
>  > flash that heavily.
>
>  Yes, but I have to visit "those sites" otherwise, I
>  cannot read many messages and posts.  I have tried
>  adblockers, but they make the page load more slowly
>  and at home, it makes it really a pain in the as*
>
> >
>  >
>  > >  If some software is illegal, what will the big
>  > guys do
>  > >  to a little guy?  Will they sue me because I have
>  > >  nonfree stuff?  What will they do to me?  I can
>  > see
>  > >  the logic for the big corporations and companies,
>  > but
>  > >  for the little guys, the home users, it does not
>  > make
>  > >  much sense.
>  >
>  > Who says it has to make sense? Big business sue
>  > little guys all the time.
>  You are right :) RIAA rings a bell.  Question is why?
>  do they go after someone who has next to nothing,
>  instead of others who have more?
>
Because others who have more, have the resources to tie them up in
court for years.

Max