Where the h%^&^%$#! is KDE 4.1 ? Part II

[Arthur Pemberton]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<pocallaghan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 18:28 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:43 PM, linuxguy <linuxguy123 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Its now 2 weeks past the end of July, when we were told KDE 4.1 would
>> > ship.  I've been stuck with this crappy, half working KDE 4.0 interface
>> > for 6 weeks.  You could say I'm a bit miffed.
>> >
>> > Say whatever you want about Fedora being bleeding edge, etc, but this is
>> > by far the worst release Fedora and Redhat has ever done.   As far as I
>> > am concerned, the KDE team has knocked the credibility of Linux, Fedora
>> > and the KDE team itself way, way back.
>> >
>> > I am very disappointed with the current state of the Linux desktop as
>> > demonstrated in F9.  The people that allowed KDE4.0 to ship in F9 showed
>> > a huge lapse in judgement.
>> >
>> > Still upset about being stuck with KDE4.0,
>> > LG
>>
>>
>> Why did you update to KDE 4.0?
>
> 4.0 is what comes with F9.

F9 doesn't magically appear on ones machine. At least I had to
manually do the upgrade/update.

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )