Where the h%^&^%$#! is KDE 4.1 ? Part II

[Arthur Pemberton]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 18:28 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:43 PM, linuxguy <linuxguy123 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Its now 2 weeks past the end of July, when we were told KDE 4.1 would
>> > ship.  I've been stuck with this crappy, half working KDE 4.0 interface
>> > for 6 weeks.  You could say I'm a bit miffed.
>> >
>> > Say whatever you want about Fedora being bleeding edge, etc, but this is
>> > by far the worst release Fedora and Redhat has ever done.   As far as I
>> > am concerned, the KDE team has knocked the credibility of Linux, Fedora
>> > and the KDE team itself way, way back.
>> >
>> > I am very disappointed with the current state of the Linux desktop as
>> > demonstrated in F9.  The people that allowed KDE4.0 to ship in F9 showed
>> > a huge lapse in judgement.
>> >
>> > Still upset about being stuck with KDE4.0,
>> > LG
>>
>>
>> Why did you update to KDE 4.0?
> ----
> let it die...even with 4.1 (at least from what I've seen from
> updates-testing), there's still feature regression which is the OP's
> complaint - and it's valid.
>
> some of us are willing to give KDE the benefit of the doubt and think
> that it will ultimately be a better desktop manager but griping was
> inevitable.
>

Just seems to me that people should take responsibility for what they
install. It was never claimed that KDE4.0 would have more features and
be more stable than 3.5. At least not by anyone credible.

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )