Where the h%^&^%$#! is KDE 4.1 ? Part II

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 18:37 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> <pocallaghan at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 18:28 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:43 PM, linuxguy <linuxguy123 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Its now 2 weeks past the end of July, when we were told KDE 4.1 would
> >> > ship.  I've been stuck with this crappy, half working KDE 4.0 interface
> >> > for 6 weeks.  You could say I'm a bit miffed.
> >> >
> >> > Say whatever you want about Fedora being bleeding edge, etc, but this is
> >> > by far the worst release Fedora and Redhat has ever done.   As far as I
> >> > am concerned, the KDE team has knocked the credibility of Linux, Fedora
> >> > and the KDE team itself way, way back.
> >> >
> >> > I am very disappointed with the current state of the Linux desktop as
> >> > demonstrated in F9.  The people that allowed KDE4.0 to ship in F9 showed
> >> > a huge lapse in judgement.
> >> >
> >> > Still upset about being stuck with KDE4.0,
> >> > LG
> >>
> >>
> >> Why did you update to KDE 4.0?
> >
> > 4.0 is what comes with F9.
> 
> F9 doesn't magically appear on ones machine. At least I had to
> manually do the upgrade/update.

So perhaps you meant to ask why he upgraded to F9. Never mind.

poc