Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200

[Anne Wilson]

On Friday 22 August 2008 02:08:12 Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:28:36 +0900
>
> Joel Rees <joel.rees at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Because I never thought the list was informative.
> >
> > This is a perception that needs correcting.
>
> Actually, when this all started, I took a look at the
> announce list archives, and came to the definitive conclusion
> that in fact, it really isn't an informative list.
> I mean, even the announcement that started this whole
> mess can't be called informative :-).
>
> What we really need is the fedora-disaster list that
> comes with a guarantee that no message not related to imminent
> peril to all fedora users is ever posted to the list.
> I might consider subscribing to that, but really I still
> think messages of that nature should be cross posted
> to all fedora mailing lists.

I do find this attitude strange.  There are maybe 15 messages per week from 
announce, and I can skin through and this 'I need that update' or 'those 
don't affect me', which saves me a good bit of time.

Far more time is wasted on reading speculation on this list.

Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080822/ef7abfec/attachment-0001.bin