non-disclosure of infrastructure problem a management issue?

[Björn Persson]

Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> 2008/8/22 Björn Persson <bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se>:
> > I agree. I can't see any reason why they couldn't have said the following
> > a week ago:
>
> Legal issues? the word was used in the first sentence.

The first sentence in the first announcement was "The Fedora Infrastructure 
team is currently investigating an issue in the infrastructure systems.". The 
word "legal" does not occur in that sentence so I have to assume that the 
word you refer to is "issue". That's a word with many meanings:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/issue

None of those meanings convey to me the idea that "we're prohibited by law 
from telling you what kind of problem this is". "An issue in the 
infrastructure systems" sounds like a *technical* problem to me.

Björn Persson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080823/3a5585a0/attachment-0001.bin