The Scope and Ownership of fedora-list

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 01:06 +0800, Fennix wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Mike Chambers <mike at miketc.net>
> wrote:
>         On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 10:32 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
>         
>         > It's (traditional) C. Put it into a file like self-rep.c and
>         then
>         >
>         > $ gcc -o self-rep self-rep.c
>         > $ ./self-rep
>         >
>         > and see what happens.
>         
>         
>         [mike at scrappy ~]$ gcc -o test test.c
>         test.c:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage
>         class
>         test.c:1: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer
>         without a
>         cast
>         test.c: In function 'main':
>         test.c:1: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of
>         built-in
>         function 'printf'
>         test.c:1: warning: passing argument 1 of 'printf' makes
>         pointer from
>         integer without a cast
>         [mike at scrappy ~]$ ./test
>         p="p=%c%s%
>         c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}[mike at scrappy
>         ~]$
>         
>         That's what happened when doing it on a F9 box.
>         
>         --
>         Mike Chambers
>         Fedora Project - Ambassador, Bug Zapper, Tester, User, etc..
>         mikec302 at fedoraproject.org
>         
>         
>         
>         --
>         fedora-list mailing list
>         fedora-list at redhat.com
>         To unsubscribe:
>         https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>         Guidelines:
>         http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>         
> 
> Hmmm... c++  vs  standard C?

It's not C++. The compiler warnings are because it violates the current
C standard regarding type safety. It would have compiled on a Unix
system 25 years ago without complaint, but now you'd need to add flags
to the gcc line to make it shut up.

poc