Closed source modules will be banned from kernel?
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva at redhat.com
Sun Jul 13 21:10:40 UTC 2008
On Jul 7, 2008, Antonio Olivares <olivares14031 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- On Mon, 7/7/08, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> GPLv2 vs GPLv3 doesn't make much of a difference.
> If it did not make much of a difference, then why is Linus Torvalds
> very much opposed to releasing the kernel(s) in this new version?
> There has to be a catch here!
Mainly out of early misunderstandings, and out of political reasons,
such as his defense of tivoization (because it's more tit-for-tat?).
Add to that the eternal defensiveness from the moral and ethical
grounds of the Free Software movement, encoded in the GPL and
furthered in GPLv3.
There sure is a catch :-)
In case you want to dig deeper, I wrote a lot about GPLv3, trying to
debunk some of the objections about it that came from that general
direction.
http://fsfla.org/blogs/lxo/draft/gplv3-snowwhite
http://fsfla.org/blogs/lxo/draft/tivoization-and-communities
http://fsfla.org/blogs/lxo/draft/forking-and-license-patching
http://fsfla.org/blogs/lxo/2007-06-29-gplv3-tivo-and-linux
http://fsfla.org/blogs/lxo/2007-07-01-gplv3-tivo-and-linux
http://fsfla.org/blogs/lxo/2007-07-19-gplv3-tivo-and-linux
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
More information about the users
mailing list