"the whole GNU/Linux thing"
darthbulk at warp-7.com
Wed Jul 16 14:08:58 UTC 2008
At 08:03 AM 7/16/2008, you wrote:
>Daniel R. Koehler wrote:
> > Maybe we should just refer to the whole GNU/Linux
> > thing with a new name, that includes neither
> > "GNU" or "Linux". Call it Everyone's Operating
> > System (EOS) or something that is more creative
> > than what I can think of right now.
>But what *is* that "whole thing" that might be called EOS? Where can I
>download it from? Is there a list of what components it contains? We need to
>define what it is before we can give it a name.
> > That way,
> > everyone can form a picture in their own mind of
> > what it means, be it the kernel, the interface,
> > the tools, the distribution, or whatever.
>I think one of the major causes for this eternal argument is just that.
>Everyone forms their own picture of what "Linux" or "GNU/Linux" means, and
>people keep talking past each other because they don't realize that they're
>talking about different things.
You are right, that is the rub. I am reminded of a bit of
wisdom from my technical writing days: Know your audience. For many
members of this list, when speaking about "GNU/Linux", there is a
definite meaning and even personal feelings about this, so one must
choose their words well. I think GNU/Linux is fine. For most people
who just use the distributions on a daily basis, terms like "Fedora"
or "Linux" or "Fedora: A Linux OS" all mean the same thing, even if
not technically correct. If I even say "GNU" they give a blank stare.
I have no problem with using the term "GNU/Linux", with the
right audience. But I more often just use the distribution names.
I apologize for my earlier long post with everything
quoted. I was using an unfamiliar computer and email client, and it
obviously didn't work right.
SCANNED for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner.
Believed to be clean.
More information about the users