OT: Apology for Daniel R. Koehler
Daniel R. Koehler
darthbulk at warp-7.com
Fri Jul 18 02:02:36 UTC 2008
At 08:27 PM 7/17/2008, you wrote:
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:35:07 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Joe Klemmer <klemmerj at webtrek.com>
>Subject: OT: Apology for Daniel R. Koehler
>To: fedora-list at redhat.com
>Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807171827280.28061 at webtrek.com>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
>
> It seems that Mr. Koehler has blocked my email so forgive me for
>taking up a small space on this list to send my apology.
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
>Subject: Re: fedora list
>
>Daniel R. Koehler wrote Today about fedora list:
>
> > It was a simple mistake. I apologize for not trimming the message
> > down. On the other hand, there really was no need for the type
> of response
> > you gave. Do you realize, that you are the only one who thought
> sending the
> > entire message back to me and then blocking any reply was in any way an
> > appropriate response?
>
> I didn't intentionally block you from replying but I will own up to
>sending the whole thing back. It was a situation where I let the
>aggravations
>of the day interfere with my online conduct. It's no excuse, just an
>explanation. It's also what got me entangled in the GNU/Linux noise. Please
>accept my apologies for not being a good netitizen.
>
> If you are still having trouble sending to
> klemmerj at webtrek.com let me
>know. That's shouldn't be happening.
>
>--
Apology accepted. I don't often use these Listserv style discussion
boards, so it is easy for me to make a mistake in replying to one. I
also will learn to use it better so as not to cause problems in the future.
I did block your email after receiving the first one, because,
truthfully, I knew nothing about you except that I got such an email
from you and I didn't want my email account abused. Now I can remove
the block because I know better.
Have a nice day,
Daniel R. Koehler
--
SCANNED for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner.
Believed to be clean.
More information about the users
mailing list