that old GNU/Linux argument

[Björn Persson]

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> trying (fruitlessly it seems) to get some
> consistency in the use of terminology,

That's what I'm trying to achieve too. Or if it isn't possible to get people 
to agree on terminology, then I'd like to at least understand what people 
mean when they use a word. To that end I'm asking people what they mean when 
they say "Linux", but so far I'm not getting very clear anwers.

Would you like to tell us where *you* draw the line? What is part of Linux in 
your mind, and what is not part of Linux?

Björn Persson