Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva at redhat.com
Tue Jul 22 05:12:30 UTC 2008
On Jul 21, 2008, Alan Cox <alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> The GPL meets both the FS and the OSS definition.
> News to me.
http://www.opensource.org/node/193
> GPLv3 has clauses which are specifically aimed at certain uses
I guess it's pointless for me to ask you to substantiate this, since
you're probably back to the silliness of kill-filing me. But if you
read this, please do.
> OSS no. Something I imagine RMS is not too worried about ?
Why stop at the speculation? Go ahead, ask him, then let us know.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
More information about the users
mailing list