that old GNU/Linux argument

[Rui Miguel Silva Seabra]

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:35:24PM -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> --- On Mon, 7/28/08, Claude Jones <cjones at levitjames.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Claude Jones <cjones at levitjames.com>
> > 
> > I too am beginning to chafe. You have not only become
> > tiresome, 
> > but, you are also not entirely credible; Mr. Stallman
> > posted to 
> > this list on the 17th, conveniently starting a new thread
> > which 
> > to all appearance was in response to this endless
> > discussion, and 
> > if you are claiming that you are unaware of that fact,
> > then, you 
> > just completely lost me...you can't employ small
> > prevarications 
> > in the cause of great truths - it's the price you pay
> > if you 
> > choose to mix metaphors and call what it is you're
> > doing here, 
> > "evangelizing"...
> 
> Claude, 
> 
> here's the proof that on 17th Day of June, 2008 RMS posted this 
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2008-July/msg01977.html

The only proof that is, is of a quite acute case of trying to fit
facts to imagination.

Anyone who reads that link:
 a) sees Stallman didn't "start" any thread
 b) sees the content is not related to "GNU/Linux vs Linux" naming
    but to a fake GPL4
 c) sees that you're trying hard for people to believe it's proof
    just because it's a link and don't follow it to verify
 d) then concludes something fishy is going on with your intentions.

Rui

-- 
Hail Eris, Hack GNU/Linux!
Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 63rd day of Confusion in the YOLD 3174
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?