Any hope of KDE 3.5 in F10? I want it too !

Arthur Pemberton pemboa at gmail.com
Tue Jun 17 14:35:21 UTC 2008


On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Andrew Kelly <akelly at corisweb.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 12:17 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Andrew Kelly <akelly at corisweb.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 15:03 -0600, linuxguy wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 09:38 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
>> >> > QUESTION TO DEVELOPERS: Is there any hope of a full KDE 3.5
>> >> > in F10, plus an upgrade path from F8 to F10 that preserves
>> >> > KDE 3.5 configurations?
>> >> >
>> >> > KDE 4.0 is incomplete and not suitable for most users.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I totally agree !  I was going to post about this but I didn't want to
>> >> upset the group.   But its true !  F9 is the WORST RH/Fedora release I
>> >> have ever used and I've been doing this since RH8.
>> >>
>> >> I want KDE 3.5 back for F10.
>> >>
>> >> And don't give me the crap that Fedora is bleeding edge software.   F9
>> >> is beyond bleeding, its suicidal.
>> >>
>> >
>> > F10 will be out before you know it, and F8 still gets dozens of updates
>> > a week. I still can't get that to sit well with me. Are things being
>> > accelerated to the point of there being 5 Fedora releases for each RHEL
>> > release? Or is EL re-tooling for annual releases, maybe?
>> >
>> > Andy
>>
>> Has anything change? Doesn't Fedora still follow it's original 6 month
>> release cycle?
>
> Yeah, guess you're right, Arthur. Sure feels quicker to me lately,
> though. Don't know why.
> Mebbe it's just my brain slowing down.

According to the last announcement made about the releases (public announcement)

A month (or a few weeks) were skipped to get back on track with
schedule. I can't remember the details. So last release cycle was
likely less than exactly 6 months.

> When is RHEL 6 supposed to release?

I don't know.

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )




More information about the users mailing list