Fedora ain't playin' around w/Firefox 3.
geleem at bellsouth.net
Thu Jun 19 06:16:48 UTC 2008
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> company, that FF is for legal purposes a commercial product (even if
i do believe that there is a lot of lack of understanding in use of word
'commercial' thru this posting.
i believe in this case, 'commercial' is used to indicate that product is
'in public hands', verses a product that is 'designed' or 'written'
'privately' for 'closed use'.
charging or not charging for product is not relevant.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
More information about the users