What is the matter with fedora 9?

[Mikkel L. Ellertson]

Stephen Berg (Contractor) wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
> After about a dozen installs of Fedora 9 I cannot agree with you on 
> that.  On every system save one there is only one network connection, in 
> each of those cases it's been /dev/eth0 and NM would not enable the 
> connection by default.
> Maybe there's documentation on the way that will make NM a breeze to 
> configure but until that time it's out the window.  I disable the 
> NetworkManager service and enable the network service during kickstart 
> installs.  All my systems have a statically leased DHCP address and it 
> works just fine.
> Bottom line for me:  NM breaks far more than it fixes.
> 
One problem for a lot of people is that NM does not open the network 
connection until the user logs in. This is a problem for anything 
that needs a network connection before you log in.

Mikkel
-- 

   Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080626/a4654e63/attachment-0001.bin