Burning a kernel
rock_on_the_web at comcen.com.au
Thu Mar 6 23:41:15 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 01:14 -0500, Ric Moore wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 13:45 -0800, Kam Leo wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:01 AM, MK <halfcountplus at intergate.com> wrote:
> > > Kam Leo hypothesized:
> > No hypothesis. Just applying basic knowledge regarding the kernel to
> > the problem that was described.
> > > > You might be able to get improved performance by changing from the
> > > > kernel's default I/O scheduler (CFQ).
> > >
> > > I switched the default to the "anticipatory" scheduler (leaving CFQ and
> > > deadline built-in) because of xine lock-ups and that DEFINATELY did the
> > > trick (126.96.36.199).
> > Why was building a custom version of the kernel necessary? Didn't
> > appending "elevator=as" work for you?
> I'm gonna give that a whirl after I plug through this pile of email!
> Thank you for the hint, and I will let you know the result. Ric
> My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
> "There are two Great Sins in the world...
> ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
> Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
> Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/
> http://www.wayward4now.net <---down4now too
Sorry if I'm hijacking this thread, but I'm having trouble finding a
solution to a source problem myself. I've got kernel-devel rpms
installed for an i586, and a i686 kernel. Now when I try to build a
module for my tv card it says it can't find .config file.
So what I have is a 137.i686 kernel, and a 42.i686 source, plus a
137.i586. When it builds the module it looks for i686 source and fails.
My question is: is there an i686 kernel-devel rpm for f8? I managed to
build this module before, but I'm assuming there was no discrepancy
between kernel and kernel-devel before.
More information about the users