kmail dead in water, using tbird I hope

Michael Schwendt mschwendt at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 16:52:43 UTC 2008


On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:48:16 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:

> On Monday 24 March 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:01:52 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> I've had several hard lockups over the last day, possibly related to a
> >> tickless kernel2.6.24.1 I could keep running long enough to recompile it
> >> with the usual kilohertz tick, so ATM I'm on one of the older 2.6.23
> >> kernels from the F8 repo's, and kde is 3.5.9
> >>
> >> Anyway, kmail (and kontact but I don't use it) is now doing a nearly
> >> instant Signal 11.  The kmail.kcrash report sort of points a finger at
> >> libkmailprivate.so, but I've stopped X, had yum rip out kdepim and
> >> kdepim-libs, and then re-install them with no effect on the crash.
> >>
> >> So here is the kmail.kcrash text:
> >> Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
> >> (no debugging symbols found)
> >> [snip many lines oof this]
> >> (no debugging symbols found)
> >> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> >> [New Thread -1208654128 (LWP 25523)]
> >> (no debugging symbols found)
> >> [snip many more lines]
> >> (no debugging symbols found)
> >
> >This means that you should install the corresponding -debuginfo rpms to
> >fill in the missing details in the backtrace.
> >
> Where might those be found?, yum shows nothing.

In the [fedora-debuginfo] repo, and you need not enable that one,
because there are tools to install them:

  $ rpm -qf $(which debuginfo-install)
  yum-utils-1.1.11-1.fc8

The Wiki has additional information about them and backtraces:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces

> How can I force an fsck on /dev/VolGroupVol00 on the next boot?

Add "forcefsck" to the command line.

> >Do you realise that it could be a segfault caused by corrupted input data
> >and not by corrupted packages? Depending on what libkmailprivate does in
> >this area of the code, it could be that it doesn't verify the input data
> >enough as would be necessary to prevent it from crashing.
> 
> Should I, when things settle, file a bugzilla against libkmailprivate.so?  Or 
> whatever it is that manages the .index files?

In the KDE bug tracker, yes. It's an error condition that ought to be
handled IMO.




More information about the users mailing list