Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help

[edwardspl at ita.org.mo]

Antonio Olivares wrote:

>--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Tim <ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>From: Tim <ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au>
>>Subject: Re: Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help
>>To: olivares14031 at yahoo.com, "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list at redhat.com>
>>Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 1:57 AM
>>On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 17:42 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>>>}
>>>
>>># This is a very basic subnet declaration.
>>>
>>>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
>>>  range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
>>>  option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org,
>>>      
>>>
>>rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
>>    
>>
>>>}
>>>      
>>>
>>It seems pointlessly redundant to declare a subnet twice. 
>>And stranger
>>to declare it differently.  I see no point for the first
>>one.
>>
>>-- 
>>[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
>>2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686
>>
>>Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox
>>is ignored.  I
>>read messages from the public lists.
>>    
>>
>
>Which one should I keep Tim, the first one or the second one?
>
>I have tried  before and not succeeded, I want to succeed this time. 
>
>The machine that will become the server has gateway 10.154.19.1, is it okay to make the server 
>10.154.19.0 ?
>
>Also the machine's netmask is 255.255.255.0 and the netmask of the server should it be 255.255.255.0 or 255.255.255.254 or other thing?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Antonio
>

Dear You,

Please try these :

<>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224
{
range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org,rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
}

Good luck !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081115/befe0ec4/attachment-0001.html