EeePC - to Fedora or not?

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 18:31 +0000, Beartooth wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:23:32 -0400, Jim wrote:
> 	[...]
> >> So which version of F10 Beta do I want to use? i386, or
> >> something else??
> >>
> >>
> > I installed FC-10 Beta  i386 or i686 on my eeePC 702,  and all hardware
> > works great.
> 
> 	Downloading now; many thanks!

Just to toot the horns of some of the people I work with (and certainly
not my own, since I had nothing whatsoever to do with the matter), a few
of the Fedora hackers inside Red Hat actually did quite a bit of kernel
work upstream to get Linux kernel driver support for these units.  I
don't know if they have 100% coverage for all the eeePCs but it's
certainly a lot farther along than it would have been otherwise.

-- 
Paul W. Frields
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081016/73724d06/attachment-0001.bin