first yum went OK, however the second got the following
Paul Newell
pnewell at cs.cmu.edu
Sun Sep 14 06:27:23 UTC 2008
Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 19:28 -0400, Jim wrote:
>
>> Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 18:31 -0400, Jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> landon kelsey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Setting up Update Process
>>>>> Resolving Dependencies
>>>>> --> Running transaction check
>>>>> ---> Package yum-utils.noarch 0:1.1.16-1.fc9 set to be updated
>>>>> --> Processing Dependency: yum >= 3.2.19 for package: yum-utils
>>>>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>>>>> yum-utils-1.1.16-1.fc9.noarch from updates-newkey has depsolving problems
>>>>> --> Missing Dependency: yum >= 3.2.19 is needed by package
>>>>> yum-utils-1.1.16-1.fc9.noarch (updates-newkey)
>>>>> Error: Missing Dependency: yum >= 3.2.19 is needed by package
>>>>> yum-utils-1.1.16-1.fc9.noarch (updates-newkey)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> i ran into the same problem, I going to wait a few days and run the
>>>> update for yum, by then somebody will fix the dependency.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No need to wait, read the notice here for help:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Enabling_new_signing_key#Known_Issues
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I did read that wiki and updated the new Key , that does not fix the Yum
>> update, The "yum-utils" shows up in the updates, but the "yum" package
>> is not in the updates, that is what's causing the problems, no "yum"
>> package.
>> Thats why I said someone will catch it in a few days and put the "yum"
>> package in the updates repo.
>>
>>
> It may not be in the fedoraq.updates .repo but in the
> fedora.updates.newkey.repo which is the one being used.
>
For what is is worth, I had no problem re-installing and updating and
yum made no complaints. Things appear to be working as far as I can tell.
Paul
More information about the users
mailing list