Interactive startup on F10. Pressing "I" doesn't work
Sharpe, Sam J
sam.sharpe+lists.redhat at gmail.com
Fri Apr 3 08:04:45 UTC 2009
2009/4/3 Aldo Foot <lunixer at gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Sharpe, Sam J
> <sam.sharpe+lists.redhat at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/4/3 Aldo Foot <lunixer at gmail.com>:
>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Nigel Henry
>>> <cave.dnb2m97pp at aliceadsl.fr> wrote:
>>>> On F9 I had to press the "I" a few times to enter interactive startup, on
>>> The current approach is not practical, there should be a custom timeout to
>>> give time to press 'i".
>> I don't think interactive startup should exist at all.
>> If you want to disable services, use Rescue Mode or Single User Mode.
>> When a system is booted to multi-user-graphical I want the same
>> scripts running as last time thankyou, regardless of any finger
>> mashing by the user.
> I'll respectfully disagree. Under the right conditions it could be beneficial
> to have the interactive boot option.
Name one that can't be solved with single user or rescue mode... I'm
not trying to fight you, but I am interested in this discussion as
I've never seen the point of Interactive Init.
> Also, let's don't forget that there are a bunch of systems out there that don't
> need a graphical environment to do their job.
Sorry, I picked runlevel 5 as an example, because most of the systems
co-located with my fingermashers are graphical. The same applies to
runlevel 3, except those machines generally don't have keyboards and
monitors which restricts tinkering - I would prefer they are
consistently booted and the option to hit i was not available - is
there an easy way to turn it off that I have missed?
> I think most will agree that the finger mashing is very impractical.
Yes. I prefer to hit this at the grub menu:
It feels a lot more reliable than hammering one key until you get the
More information about the users