[OT] SSH login script - Help
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Thu Apr 30 04:00:24 UTC 2009
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 23:20 -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> Bill, I would have to say that the answer is yes. Besides the fact
> that logging in via a passwordless system is more convenient, it's
> also more secure; you're username and password is never in the clear.
It's not, anyway, with a SSH connection. The whole thing is encrypted.
Telnet isn't, plain authentication with POP3, IMAP, and SMTP, etc.,
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
More information about the users