[OT] SSH login script - Help

Tim ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Thu Apr 30 04:00:24 UTC 2009

On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 23:20 -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> Bill, I would have to say that the answer is yes. Besides the fact
> that logging in via a passwordless system is more convenient, it's
> also more secure; you're username and password is never in the clear. 

It's not, anyway, with a SSH connection.  The whole thing is encrypted.

Telnet isn't, plain authentication with POP3, IMAP, and SMTP, etc.,

[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.

More information about the users mailing list