ssh clarification needed
Mike Cloaked
mike.cloaked at gmail.com
Sun Jan 4 22:06:49 UTC 2009
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
>
>> I doubt it too - but having the keys means you can use them to login in
>> as
>> if the original owner!
>
> Only if you can crack the pass phrase or the user was dumb enough to
> create a private key without a pass phrase. (I have used them on
> servers that need to connect to another server for a specific job,
> but the other server is configured to run a specific command when
> that key is used to connect.)
>
> A brute force password cracker is going to have a hard time unless
> someone picked a real poor pass phrase. You may have better luck if
>
>
Yup you are right - I just forgot you need to have the passphrase to start
the agent usually....
But if the key was generated without a passphrase then it would be a gift!!
Sorry for the mis-direction....
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ssh-clarification-needed-tp21274919p21281937.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the users
mailing list