Package Manager Denies Permission to Install
akonstam at sbcglobal.net
Fri Jan 23 21:20:49 UTC 2009
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 12:10 -0500, R. G. Newbury wrote:
> Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> > > But PolicyKit does not work in a root session:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447266
> > Hmm...this is probably worthy of some nuanced and masterfully
> > persuasive oratory as to where to strike the balance between designing
> > for expected use cases and designing a system with flexibility to
> > accomedate local needs even when those use cases are not considered
> > best practises. .
> No nuanced and masterfully persuasive oratory can disguise the fact that
> someone has made *and enforced* a decision that *they know better
> than the user* how "THINGS MUST BE DONE" purely because the doing, is
> considered to be 'not best practice'.
> In this particular case, the 'best practice' enforcement approaches
> religious fervour in its application. In the particular instance which
> started this thread, PolicyKit nags about being root, and then *refuses*
> to allow the installation of an rpm! It does not deny the right to
> download and install the rpm in a console....It just denies the user the
> advantages of using PackageManager to resolve dependenices directly.
> And *exactly* what nuanced extra is added to the equation, by forcing
> the administrator to log out of root, to log in as a user, to do the
> same thing? Especially in a circumstance where the install is actually
> desired to be general and not user-local? This position is idiocy.
> I don't mind a nag. I DO mind unknown and unaccountable people
> attempting to enforce their quasi-religious beliefs on me (by
> quasi-religious, I mean the attitude which equates doing anything while
> root is akin to giving booze and car-keys to seventeen year old boys:
> instantly and always catastrophically dangerous.) I know using root can
> increase the probability of disaster. But I want to be able to decide
> what the limits of my risk tolerance are, not have someone else do it.
> That argument, the libertarian argumnent is one of the underlying bases
> of the free software movement. Let's have it recognized and venerated in
> the code!
My memory is that the designer of PackageManager indicated on the list
that running PackageManager as root has security problems that running
it as a user and entering the root password does not have. I believed
him. Your objection is that it makes you log as a user rather than as
I believe in the theory that "freedom" derives from the words free doom
indicating that everyone has a right to commit suicide in his (or her)
own way. I strongly support your committing suicide in any way you
Never ask the barber if you need a haircut.
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam at sbcglobal.net
More information about the users