ISO download very failed
Steve Searle
steve at stevesearle.com
Wed Jun 10 22:59:17 UTC 2009
Around 11:53pm on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 (UK time), Kevin J. Cummings scrawled:
> No, that can't be it, as it gives me the same (good) hash with and
> without the -b/-t options.
From man sha256sum:
Note: There is no difference between binary and text mode option on GNU
system.
>
> Are you running sha256sum against the .iso file? Or against a burned
> DVD???? sha256sum should only be run against the .iso file before
> burning it.
Against the iso - I haven't burned it, I usually mount it with -loop and
install via nfs.
The bittorrent client I used was transmission, and the drive is OK
afaik.
I think it has got mangled on my machine. Not a problem, but at least
this thread will flag it if their was a wrong version out there.
Steve
--
Play Champions - my free football predictions game at:
http://www.stevesearle.com/champs/about.html
23:55:44 up 32 days, 10:20, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.03, 0.01
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090610/6e277308/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the users
mailing list