Munged Headers....

[Ed Greshko]

Cameron Simpson wrote:
> And since I can't find the supposed header you're arguing about I'm
> having trouble sorting this out.
>
>   
Here it is....  However, it may not be in its exact original form since
it may not survive wrapping in the body of the email.  I'll put in a \
where I think wrapping may occur.  Also, I'll send you the original
email as an attachment directly to you since the list won't accept
attachments.

Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:05:26 -0600
From: Frank Cox <theatre at sasktel.net>
In-reply-to: <1253713090.18252.2.camel at politzer.theorphys.helsinki.fi>
To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q? Community_assistance, _encouragement,     
=09and_advice_for_?\
= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?using_Fedora. ?="
 <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-id: <20090923100526.69deafe9.theatre at sasktel.net>
Organization: Melville Theatre

As mentioned several times, the string enclosed within " in the To:
header is a text comment field and not an address.  It matters not that
is contains encoded text.  The comma is not a field separator.  Yet the
reply generated by mutt treated it as such.




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090928/c8cceda9/attachment-0001.bin