rpm architecture

[Aioanei Rares]

On 04/09/2010 04:11 PM, Ray Pittigher wrote:
>
> On 04/09/2010 08:40 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
>    
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Ray Pittigher<raymond.pittigher at itt.com>   wrote:
>>      
>>> Having some problems installing rpm packages,what does it mean when every package claims it is the wrong architecture?
>>>
>>> for example..
>>>
>>>
>>> rpm  -Uvh python-2.4.3-27.el5.x86_64.rpm python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.* python-urlgrabber-3.1.0-5.el5.noarch.rpm
>>> Preparing...                ########################################### [100%]
>>>          package python-2.4.3-27.el5.x86_64 is intended for a x86_64 architecture
>>>          package python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.i386 is intended for a i386 architecture
>>>          package python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.x86_64 is intended for a x86_64 architecture
>>>          package python-urlgrabber-3.1.0-5.el5.noarch is intended for a noarch architecture
>>>        
>> If your
>>      uname -i
>>
>> doesn't match the output from
>>
>>     rpm -qp --queryformat "%{arch}\n" package_name.rpm
>>
>> Then it will send that error.  In this case it's trying to install an
>> x86_64 rpm but you may be running something else.
>>
>> What is the output from 'uname -i' on your system?
>>      
> It does not seem to make a difference on what package I try to install
>
> rpm -Uvh zenity-2.16.0-2.el5.x86_64.rpm
> Preparing...                ###########################################
> [100%]
>          package zenity-2.16.0-2.el5.x86_64 is intended for a x86_64 architecture
>
>
>    uname -a
> Linux server.lab.com 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 #1 SMP Wed Nov 5 09:00:19 EST
> 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender.
> Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT Corporation. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>    
So this is a RH/CentOS system, right? yum repolist?