HTML mail [was Re: FEL was Re: Hi]

[g]

On 08/08/2010 07:53 PM, g wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 03:56 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
> <snip>
> 
>> one of the arguments against HTML is that it is a waste of other
>> people's bandwidth.
> 
> true.
> 
>> Much like this discussion thread.
> 
> not really. especially if op gains a better understanding and stops
> sending 'html'.

in addition to waste of bandwidth, posting in plain text increases
number of subscribers who will read post and increase probability
of getting an answer to problem.

ie, i am not only member of this list who filters out html email.


-- 

peace out.

tc,hago.

g
.

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 545 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100808/521898cd/attachment.bin