Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2

[binarynut at comcast.net]

  On 08/09/2010 11:59 AM, JD wrote:
>    On 08/09/2010 06:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>    On 08/09/2010 09:30 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> Unfortunately it is late in the day and I don't have the time now to
>>> figure out what is "broken".
>> Ah hah....
>>
>> I see the problem....but not sure how to fix yet.....
>>
>> In the Makefile you see..... at line 236
>>
>> ifneq (,$(findstring 2.4,$(LINUX_SRC)))
>>
>> Well....the current kernel is 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.i686.PAE which
>> contains the string 2.4 so the build thinks this is a 2.4 kernel build!
>>
>> My wife and cats are yelling at me......
>>
>>
>>
> Hi Ed, and Mr. binary :)
>
> I did not keep the original build output from mr. binary ...
>
> Did the compilation error message look like this:
>
> ......
> /2010_0709_RT3572_Linux_STA_v2.4.0.1/os/linux/../../common/cmm_mac_usb.c:52:
> error: implicit declaration of function ‘usb_buffer_alloc’
>
> If so, then it has nothing to do with
> ifneq (,$(findstring 2.4,$(LINUX_SRC)))
>
> at all.
>
> It has to do with the fact that usb_buffer_alloc function is no longer
> present in the kernel sources of the linux version you are compiling for.
> Nor is it present in my kernel source 2.6.35-git1
>
> It was present in
>
>
> kernel-2.6.32.16-150.fc12.src/linux-2.6.32/drivers/usb/core/usb.c
>
> and exported via header file
>
> kernel-2.6.32.16-150.fc12.src/linux-2.6.32/include/linux/usb.h
>
> This function was taken out sometime kernel 2.6.32.16-150
>
> This is the problem with ralinktech. They do not keep up with
> linux kernel changes. They think one hat fits all is the way to go.
> Unlike, for example, VirtualBox - which has a separate release for
> several kernel revisions of Fedora.
>
>
Does that mean I have to scrap the compile ideal and wait for them to 
come out with a Linux  driver ?