[RHEL question] why is beta 2 so much smaller?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Sun Aug 15 11:52:23 UTC 2010
slightly off-topic but i don't have the heart to subscribe to yet
another mailing list -- i want to download the latest beta (2?) of
RHEL 6, and i've ended up here:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/6Server-beta2/x86_64/iso/
where i can see the two ISO images:
RHEL6.0-20100622.1-Server-x86_64-DVD1.iso 3.9GB
RHEL6.0-20100715.2-Server-x86_64-DVD1.iso 3.2GB
based on the datestamps in the filenames, i would think that second
ISO is the latest x86_64 image, but it looks odd that it's
significantly smaller than the earlier one. or am i misinterpreting
what i'm looking at? thanks.
rday
p.s. the above is for the server version. over at the workstation
version:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/6Workstation-beta2/x86_64/iso/
things look more reasonable. or at least what i might have expected.
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Top-notch, inexpensive online Linux/OSS/kernel courses
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
More information about the users
mailing list