[RHEL question] why is beta 2 so much smaller?
nux at li.nux.ro
nux at li.nux.ro
Sun Aug 15 16:52:20 UTC 2010
Robert P. J. Day writes:
>
> slightly off-topic but i don't have the heart to subscribe to yet
> another mailing list -- i want to download the latest beta (2?) of
> RHEL 6, and i've ended up here:
>
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/6Server-beta2/x86_64/iso/
>
> where i can see the two ISO images:
>
> RHEL6.0-20100622.1-Server-x86_64-DVD1.iso 3.9GB
> RHEL6.0-20100715.2-Server-x86_64-DVD1.iso 3.2GB
>
> based on the datestamps in the filenames, i would think that second
> ISO is the latest x86_64 image, but it looks odd that it's
> significantly smaller than the earlier one. or am i misinterpreting
> what i'm looking at? thanks.
Curious case indeed. Although it's a bit offtopic for this list, feel free
to reply with your findings :-)
--
Nux!
www.nux.ro
More information about the users
mailing list