Is swap really needed when RAM's aplenty

[JD]

  On 08/20/2010 07:36 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 16:15 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, JD wrote:
>>
>>> Problem comes as Michael explains, that when a process needs a large
>>> "physically contiguous" chunk of memory, it might not be available.
>>> That said, usually, requests for physically contiguous memory is only
>>> needed when wanting to map very large number of DMA pages for
>>> doing direct physical I/O.
>>> Otherwise, a process itself does not need to have physically contiguous
>>> pages. Only the virtual space allocated to that "malloc" or large buffer
>>> declaration in a program, is contiguous.
>> Why would malloc or a large buffer declaration
>> require physically contiguous memory?
> I have te equally interesting question? Why you think malloc allocates
> memory blocks in the swap area. Do you have a reference for such a
> statement?
>
Who said what you claim was said?
An OP already posted that you CAN run linux
without swap.
Normally, when you DO have swap space, user-
land data areas (both static and dynamic), will
be backed to swap if and when you run out of
memory and some other process needs memory.