F13: services marked as disabled, are shown to be running.

[JD]

  On 08/23/2010 08:15 AM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 21:53 -0700, JD wrote:
>> On 08/22/2010 09:16 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:52 -0700, JD wrote:
>>>> There is a problem with system-config-services.
>>> JD,
>>>
>>> I would have to agree. Time to BZ s-c-s. Fortunately chkconfig and ps
>>> give you independent confirmations that the unwanted services are not
>>> actually running, no matter what s-c-s may say.
>> Which is fine, if you want to do these extra steps to get this
>> sort of confirmation.
>> But the whole purpose of this util is to tell you at a glance.
>> And it is giving contradictory info.
>> If a servce is disabled, and I have nothing that starts it, then
>> the sys config services should not say the status is running.
>> In fact, even clicking on Stop, the status remains 'running'.
>> Also, I am not sure if this bug should be filed against Fedora,
>> as it is present in other distros.
> JD,
>
> Go ahead and submit a Bugzilla report against s-c-s citing exactly what
> you are seeing, what it's not doing, etc. It's been my experience that
> the service-config-whatever scripts often get lost in the shuffle of new
> packages. When their maintainers get good descriptive Bugzilla reports,
> they can frequently push out a good fix in short order.
>
> For example, about six months ago a problem with system-config-httpd was
> fixed after lying dormant for almost two releases. IIRC that problem
> turned out to be in alchemy, used by s-c-h. It took the maintainer a
> couple of months to find and fix the problem, but he eventually got it.
>
> Good luck.
> --Doc Savage
>    Fairview Heights, IL
>
OK. Sounds reasonable.
I am wondering whether or not to open the bug in
Fedora bugzilla or the more general Redhat Bugzilla?
Is there a feedback loop between fedora bugzilla and redhat bugzilla?