F13 kernel update mystery
Stephen Gallagher
sgallagh at redhat.com
Wed Aug 25 12:20:59 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/25/2010 07:38 AM, Hiisi wrote:
> 2010/8/25 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com>:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/25/2010 06:16 AM, Frank Elsner wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've 2 machines running Fedora 13, both with kernel 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.i686.
>>>
>>> When I did a "yum check-update" yesterday evening only one machine offered an
>>> update to the new new kernel 2.6.33.8-149.fc13.i686.
>>>
>>>
>>> What's behind? Different repos used by yum?
>>>
>>>
>>> --Frank Elsner
>>
>> Most likely one has a yum cache that isn't yet expired (i.e. you last
>> checked the repos more recently on one than the other).
>>
>> I'd recommend doing 'yum clean all' and then try again.
>>
>> - --
>> Stephen Gallagher
>> RHCE 804006346421761
>>
>
> I wouldn't dare to suggest using 'yum clean all' on this list. It's
> nearly the same big mistake as posting in html.
> Seriously, do one need to clean all in this situation or clean
> metadata should be enough?
Sorry, my yum-fu isn't that strong. I just recommended the quickest
option to guarantee that it would be cleaned :)
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkx1CqsACgkQeiVVYja6o6MlugCgkwo+wjbDxUxAKpyQAbUYq5Ef
HcsAnib1VJUO2OAhgFH+sdHsH3gAspRW
=pjfS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the users
mailing list