mainstream kernel code contain RT3090 support; why Fedora not include it?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:15:00 +0100
Frantisek Hanzlik <franta at hanzlici.cz> wrote:

> I'm not sure if it is right reason. Nowhere I found about this code
> is broken. And experimental - it is half of kernel code.
> 
> Information I found, was not well-founded, it could be only any
> speculation. And as I now was little look at driver sources, there
> are many changes between kernels 2.6.33 and 2.6.35-36. During nearly
> year several firmaware updates was too.

I'd suggest one or both of the following: 

a) File a bug in bugzilla.redhat.com against the kernel and ask nicely
for them to be enabled. It may simply be an oversight. Or there may be
a reason, in which case a kernel maintainer will tell you. 

or

b) Post to the fedora-kernel list and ask the same... 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101228/eed5aa76/attachment.bin