[OT] Hardlinks and directories
Suvayu Ali
fatkasuvayu+linux at gmail.com
Sat Feb 13 05:00:27 UTC 2010
On Friday 12 February 2010 07:45 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 19:20 -0800, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> $ fg %1
>>> cat> foo
>>> testing deleted files
>>> ^Z
>>> [1]+ Stopped cat> foo
>>> $ lsof +L1 -s
>>> COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NLINK NODE NAME
>>> cat 3843 jallad 1w REG 253,2 22 0 15032 /home/jallad/foo (deleted)
>>> $ fg %1
>>> cat> foo
>>> ^Z
>>> [1]+ Stopped cat> foo
>
> As far as I can see, you didn't write any extra data on the second
> reconnection to cat, and the size (22 bytes) hasn't changed. Why do you
> think there's something wrong with this?
I was expecting to see something like this on the 2nd reconnection,
cat > foo
testing deleted files
instead of,
cat > foo
On some more experimentation I realised this is how `cat' behaves, it
doesn't show the lines written the first time, it only shows the stdin
which is perfectly reasonable. My apologies :-p
>
> poc
>
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
More information about the users
mailing list