Flash ??

Patrick Bartek bartek047 at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 23 04:19:47 UTC 2010


--- On Mon, 2/22/10, bruce <badouglas at gmail.com> wrote:

> but on a seriosu tip...
> 
> i've got an amd64, with fedora9 (i know.. eol) with firefox
> (3.0.11),
> i'm running openjdk 1.0.6 and i'm having issues with using
> the 64bit
> download from the adobe/macromedia site..
> 
> i consistenly crash if i implement the lib from the
> compressed tar.gz
> file in the plugins file...
> 
> it's a curious beast...
 
Which version of Flash 64-bit?  10.0 R45 Alpha, the latest?

That version and the 32-bit one both crashed Firefox 3.0.something (32-bit and 64-bit versions, respectively) in CentOS 5.4 64-bit running in VirtualBox (not the OSE one) on my Fedora 12 system.  (I installed Cent just to have a look.)  However, the 64-bit version immediately prior to it (don't have the exact number handy), which is still installed on Fedora 9 64-bit that I upgrade to 12 from last November, and keep as a back up, still works fine.  (Well, it works with a few hiccups every-once-in-a-while.)  Haven't had time to see if the old one will work on CentOS or not.

With the 64-bit Flash series, I always keep the previous version around when installing the new one, just in case.

I wonder how long Adobe is going to putz around before releasing a Beta or Final version for us 64-bit Linux users?  I found the wrapped 32-bit Final version to be more unstable than the 64-bit Alpha one.

B


> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Patrick Bartek <bartek047 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > --- On Mon, 2/22/10, Jim <mickeyboa at sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> FC12/KDE
> >>
> >> Why won't flash play on FoxNews website.
> >> Have they changed to a $Microsoft format ??
> >
> > Works fine here.
> >
> > Fedora 12-64-bit, GNOME 2.28.2, Firefox 3.5.8
> (64-bit), Flash 10.0 R45 Alpha (64-bit)
> >
> > B



More information about the users mailing list