Who's moderating this forum?
jd1008 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 18 22:25:08 UTC 2010
On 07/18/2010 03:03 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Marcel Rieux <m.z.rieux at gmail.com
> <mailto:m.z.rieux at gmail.com>> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com
> <mailto:aph at redhat.com>> wrote:
> I think the best way for me to improve this list is to provide
> where it's needed and try to avoid tedious arguments. I don't
> that anyone made me the hall monitor.
> In the end, the only real way to improve the signal to noise
> ratio is
> to add to the signal. To that end, I'm out of here.
> Absolutely! What I don't understand is why people who want to, in
> their opinion, increase the signal to noise ratio feel necessary
> to post this shit here. Everybody knows you can filter out a
> thread or a user. What's the use of saying you're filtering my
> message if it's not for intimidation purposes? Do you need to
> comfort yourself or other users in the decision you have taken?
> The irony, Marcel, is that if your request was actually taken
> seriously, and this list became moderated (which is a headache anyway,
> since there is no "post-posted moderation" possible in a mailing list)
> is that you'd be the first to go.
More information about the users