Firewall not getting displayed

[Parshwa Murdia]

On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:45 PM, JB <jb.123abc at yahoo.com> wrote:

> # yum list *system-config-firewall*


[result]

When I run this, that is,

[root at localhost ~]# yum list *system-config-firewall*

I get:

Loaded plugins: protectbase, refresh-packagekit
adobe-linux-i386                                         |  951 B     00:00
rpmfusion-free-updates                                   | 2.8 kB     00:00
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates                                | 2.8 kB     00:00
updates/metalink                                         |  10 kB     00:00
0 packages excluded due to repository protections
Installed Packages
system-config-firewall.noarch                 1.2.16-3.fc11             @updates
system-config-firewall-tui.noarch             1.2.16-3.fc11             @updates
You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root


> [root at localhost jb]# yum deplist system-config-firewall


[result]

If I run this, that is,

[root at localhost ~]# yum deplist system-config-firewall

I get:

Loaded plugins: protectbase, refresh-packagekit
0 packages excluded due to repository protections
Finding dependencies:
package: system-config-firewall.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11
  dependency: pygtk2-libglade
   provider: pygtk2-libglade.i586 2.14.1-1.fc11
   provider: pygtk2-libglade.i586 2.14.1-2.fc11
  dependency: python
   provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11
   provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11
  dependency: config(system-config-firewall) = 1.2.16-3.fc11
   provider: system-config-firewall.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11
  dependency: gtk2 >= 2.6
   provider: gtk2.i586 2.16.1-4.fc11
   provider: gtk2.i586 2.16.6-2.fc11
  dependency: /usr/bin/python
   provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11
   provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11
  dependency: hicolor-icon-theme
   provider: hicolor-icon-theme.noarch 0.10-6
  dependency: pygtk2
   provider: pygtk2.i586 2.14.1-1.fc11
   provider: pygtk2.i586 2.14.1-2.fc11
  dependency: /bin/sh
   provider: bash.i586 4.0-6.fc11
   provider: bash.i586 4.0-9.fc11
  dependency: usermode-gtk >= 1.94
   provider: usermode-gtk.i586 1.100-2
  dependency: system-config-firewall-tui = 1.2.16-3.fc11
   provider: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11
package: system-config-firewall.noarch 1.2.16-2.fc11
  dependency: pygtk2-libglade
   provider: pygtk2-libglade.i586 2.14.1-1.fc11
   provider: pygtk2-libglade.i586 2.14.1-2.fc11
  dependency: gtk2 >= 2.6
   provider: gtk2.i586 2.16.1-4.fc11
   provider: gtk2.i586 2.16.6-2.fc11
  dependency: python
   provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11
   provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11
  dependency: config(system-config-firewall) = 1.2.16-2.fc11
   provider: system-config-firewall.noarch 1.2.16-2.fc11
  dependency: system-config-firewall-tui = 1.2.16-2.fc11
   provider: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-2.fc11
  dependency: /usr/bin/python
   provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11
   provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11
  dependency: hicolor-icon-theme
   provider: hicolor-icon-theme.noarch 0.10-6
  dependency: pygtk2
   provider: pygtk2.i586 2.14.1-1.fc11
   provider: pygtk2.i586 2.14.1-2.fc11
  dependency: /bin/sh
   provider: bash.i586 4.0-6.fc11
   provider: bash.i586 4.0-9.fc11
  dependency: usermode-gtk >= 1.94
   provider: usermode-gtk.i586 1.100-2


> [root at localhost jb]# yum deplist system-config-firewall-tui


[result]

When I run this, that is,

[root at localhost ~]# yum deplist system-config-firewall-tui

I get:

Loaded plugins: protectbase, refresh-packagekit
0 packages excluded due to repository protections
Finding dependencies:
package: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-2.fc11
  dependency: libselinux >= 1.19.1
   provider: libselinux.i586 2.0.80-1.fc11
  dependency: newt
   provider: newt.i586 0.52.10-3.fc11
   provider: newt.i586 0.52.10-4.fc11
  dependency: /usr/bin/python
   provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11
   provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11
  dependency: iptables >= 1.2.8
   provider: iptables.i586 1.4.3.1-1.fc11
  dependency: rhpl
   provider: rhpl.i586 0.221-1
  dependency: system-config-network-tui
   provider: system-config-network-tui.noarch 1.5.97-1.fc11
  dependency: config(system-config-firewall-tui) = 1.2.16-2.fc11
   provider: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-2.fc11
  dependency: iptables-ipv6
   provider: iptables-ipv6.i586 1.4.3.1-1.fc11
package: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11
  dependency: libselinux >= 1.19.1
   provider: libselinux.i586 2.0.80-1.fc11
  dependency: config(system-config-firewall-tui) = 1.2.16-3.fc11
   provider: system-config-firewall-tui.noarch 1.2.16-3.fc11
  dependency: newt
   provider: newt.i586 0.52.10-3.fc11
   provider: newt.i586 0.52.10-4.fc11
  dependency: /usr/bin/python
   provider: python.i586 2.6-7.fc11
   provider: python.i586 2.6-12.fc11
  dependency: iptables >= 1.2.8
   provider: iptables.i586 1.4.3.1-1.fc11
  dependency: rhpl
   provider: rhpl.i586 0.221-1
  dependency: system-config-network-tui
   provider: system-config-network-tui.noarch 1.5.97-1.fc11
  dependency: iptables-ipv6
   provider: iptables-ipv6.i586 1.4.3.1-1.fc11


> If the above verification does not result in finding a discrepancy, you
> basically should drop your F11 installation as not trustworthy (for whatever
> reason: you got that iso from a funny source, perhaps you used outside repos,
> you could have been hacked, whatever ...).
> F11 has reached an end-of-life point anyway (no official support/updates) and
> considering that Fedora is a fast moving target with frequent releases, it is
> rather advantageous for all of us "fanboyz" to move on to debug the next
> one.


Should there be any discrepancy? Or would it mean really to reinstall
this fedora 11, never preffered!
-- 

Regards,
Parshwa Murdia