Adobe (Temporarily?) Kills 64-Bit Flash For Linux
bartek047 at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 14 15:20:10 UTC 2010
--- On Mon, 6/14/10, Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice.org> wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 12:54 PM, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
> > --- On Sun, 6/13/10, Bill Davidsen<davidsen at tmr.com>
> >> That isn't going to make people very
> >> happy.
> >> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/06/11/1338207/Adobe-Temporarily-Kills-64-Bit-Flash-For-Linux
> > Guess I'll just continue to use 10.0 R45 Beta 64-bit
> like I have been since February when it was released.
> I works well enough for me. Yes, it crashes sometimes,
> but not often. In fact, since I cleaned Totem (and its
> related/unneeded dependencies) off my system--first with F9
> and then with F12--in favor of mplayer, I've had a lot less
> video streaming/playing problems.
> > However, I still have that
> Hulu-won't-play-with-64bit-Flash problem, except by using
> their 64-bit desktop player.
> > B
> This might be OK if they hadn't admitted that the version
> you are
> running has some huge security hole.
I thought 10.1 was the one with the problem. In any case, I don't think the "hole" will cause much problems with Linux based systems. When you read of the panic attacks people are having, it's usually about Windows systems.
More information about the users